Research Article | 02 Feb 2026

Knowledge, perception, and adoption of personal biosecurity measures among ruminant veterinarians and farmers in Georgia: A cross-sectional nationwide study

Saliha Şahin1,2 ORCID , Daniel Beltran-Alcrudo3 ORCID , Fevziye İpek Keskin-Fernandez Georges4,5 ORCID , Dragan Angelovski6, Mikheil Sokhadze7 ORCID , and Alberto Oscar Allepuz Palau5 ORCID Show more

1. Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Marmara University, İstanbul, Türkiye.

2. One Health and Zoonoses Master’s Program, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia, Budapest, Hungary.

4. Veterinary Control Central Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, Türkiye.

5. Department of Animal Health and Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Technical Adviser, Georgia.

7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), National Team Leader of NAITS, Georgia.

Corresponding author: Saliha Şahin (saliha.sahin@marmara.edu.tr)

Received: 2025-06-15, , Accepted: 11-12-2025 Published: 2026-02-02

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONE HEALTH | pg no. 51-72 | Vol. 12, Issue 1 | DOI: 10.14202/IJOH.2026.51-72
Citations:

Cite this Article

  • APA
  • MLA
  • Chicago
  • Vancouver
  • Harvard

                
              

Abstract

Background and Aim: Zoonotic diseases pose a major global public health and economic threat, particularly in regions with intensive livestock–human interaction. Georgia, in the South Caucasus, faces endemic zoonoses such as brucellosis, anthrax, and echinococcosis, yet limited information exists on the personal biosecurity practices of those most at risk. This study aimed to assess the extent, determinants, and characteristics of personal biosecurity measures (PBMs) among ruminant farmers and veterinarians in Georgia, with emphasis on their knowledge, attitudes, and perceived zoonotic risks. 

Materials and Methods: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted between July and September 2024 among 433 ruminant farmers and 114 veterinarians across nine regions and 53 municipalities. Validated, multilingual questionnaires were used to collect data on socio-demographics, zoonosis awareness, risk perception, personal protective equipment (PPE) usage, motivators, and barriers to PBM adoption. Descriptive and non-parametric analyses (Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis) were performed using R software. 

Results: Among farmers, 41.8% did not believe zoonoses could be contracted from animals, yet paradoxically scored higher in PBM implementation than those who did. Female farmers, those with higher education, and those who had discussed zoonosis prevention with experts demonstrated stronger adherence, whereas longer livestock experience predicted lower compliance. Among veterinarians, 70.2% self-rated their zoonosis knowledge as high, though only four correctly identified all listed zoonoses. Field veterinarians and those working ≥3 days/week scored significantly higher in PPE use (p < 0.05). Across all respondents, PPE usage was highest for gloves and farm-dedicated clothing but lowest for face masks and protective glasses during high-risk procedures such as parturition and carcass disposal. Discomfort and hot conditions were the main obstacles to PPE use. 

Conclusion: Personal biosecurity adoption in Georgia is widespread yet inconsistent and shaped by gender, education, experience, and perceived vulnerability. The contradiction between perceived knowledge and actual zoonotic awareness underscores the need for targeted, behavior-centered training. Expanding educational leaflets and strengthening farmer–veterinarian communication within the National Animal Health and One Health frameworks could bridge gaps between knowledge, perceptions, and practices. 

Keywords: biosecurity, farmers, Georgia, One Health, personal protective equipment, veterinarians, zoonoses.